The Battle for Sacred Forests: Legal Victory for Indigenous Rights, but Economic Interests Hold Strong
 |
Niah Cave: Historic evidence that the ancestors of the Dayak passed down the land of Borneo to its original inhabitants thousands of years ago. Photo credit: RMSP. |
🌍 DAYAK TODAY | PONTIANAK: In 2012, the Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 - Constitutional Court of Indonesia issued a landmark ruling in Case Number 35/PUU-X/2012- affirming that Indigenous forests are not state forests.
The decision was a victory for indigenous communities, recognizing their ancestral rights over lands that had long been at the mercy of powerful economic forces. This declaration should have put an end to the decades-long struggle between indigenous groups and the state over land ownership, setting clear boundaries between state-run and indigenous-managed forests.
Yet, despite this seemingly definitive ruling, the reality on the ground tells a different story. While the law had declared Indigenous forests as the rightful domain of their communities, the implementation of this ruling remains bogged down by complex political, economic, and bureaucratic challenges. The law, as always, lingers in a nebulous realm, often overwhelmed by vested interests that prioritize profit over the preservation of culture and environment. For the Indigenous peoples who have fought for generations to protect their forests, this is not just a legal battle—it's a fight for survival.
The Forest as Home: A Deep-Rooted Connection to Land and Culture
For indigenous communities, the forest is more than just a source of livelihood. It is an extension of their identity, a sacred space where their ancestors’ spirits dwell. These forests are living, breathing entities, woven into the cultural fabric of the people who inhabit them. The trees, rivers, and wildlife are not mere resources; they are integral to the very essence of who they are.
The bond between the indigenous peoples and their forests is unbreakable. To them, the forest is their home, a place that has sustained their way of life for centuries. From the intricate rituals of planting rice to the preservation of medicinal plants passed down through generations, the forest is not just a backdrop to their existence—it is central to it. When outsiders come to claim the forest as their own, it is not only land that is taken, but the very soul of a people.
Read Ngayau (1)
This deep connection to the land fuels the resistance. Indigenous groups, many of whom are already marginalized by mainstream society, stand in firm opposition to any encroachment on their sacred grounds. Yet, as the courts’ ruling stands against the backdrop of relentless economic pressures, the question arises: How can these age-old traditions and ways of life be preserved when the economic machinery of the state and multinational corporations continues to encroach upon them?
The Push for Economic Exploitation: A Nation Caught Between Growth and Tradition
While the constitutional ruling has empowered indigenous communities with legal recognition of their land rights, the Indonesian government—along with corporations and investors—still views the forests as a resource to be extracted and exploited. For decades, Indonesia’s economy has been intertwined with the deforestation caused by palm oil plantations, mining operations, and timber industries. The country’s development agenda has relied heavily on these industries, despite the long-term environmental damage and social costs.
Government policies, often aligned with the interests of multinational corporations, continue to prioritize the economic potential of the forest over its cultural and environmental significance. Forests are increasingly being seen as commodities—pieces of land that can be parceled out for profit. In this economic landscape, indigenous land rights become mere obstacles, hindrances to the extraction of wealth.
Read Dayak dan Hak Atas Tanah Adat: Antara Memori Kolektif dan Tantangan Modern
The tension between development and preservation has never been starker. The promise of jobs, economic growth, and prosperity for the nation often comes at the expense of the very people who have lived harmoniously with the land for centuries. The current trajectory suggests that the battle for indigenous forests will not be decided in the courtroom alone. It will take more than legal victories to change the entrenched systems that view the forest as an asset to be exploited rather than a sanctuary to be preserved.
Trapped Between the State and Investors — The Dayak’s Silent Struggle
Long before the birth of nations, before the idea of borders and maps, and long before the first colonial ships docked on Bornean shores, the Dayak people had already laid deep roots into the soil of this island. Archaeological evidence from Niah Cave in Miri, Sarawak, traces human presence as far back as 40,000 years ago—believed to be the early ancestors of the Dayak. These were not wanderers. They were not passing through. They belonged to this land. And the land, in turn, belonged to them—not in a legal sense, but in a sacred, ancestral way that predates the modern concept of ownership.
But in today’s political and economic reality, the Dayak are caught in a tightening vise. One jaw is the modern state, with its legal frameworks, territorial claims, and development agendas. The other jaw is the relentless push of investors—mining conglomerates, palm oil giants, and logging empires—who see the forest not as a home, but as a ledger filled with profit margins.
To the state, land is policy. To corporations, land is capital.
To the Dayak, land is breath. It is life. It is memory, song, and soul.
This clash of worldviews has placed the Dayak in an impossible position: forced to defend a way of life that existed long before the forces threatening it. They are compelled to "prove" rights to land they never once considered alienable. How do you explain to a court, or a CEO, that your forest is not a commodity—but your grandmother?
Read Peta Kolonial dan Peta Kapitalisme di Borneo
For centuries, the Dayak practiced a philosophy of adat—a customary law rooted in harmony with the forest. They moved with the seasons, farmed sustainably, honored the rivers, and passed down stories that mapped the land in ways GPS never could. But now, that same land is being parceled out in investment forums, renamed as “green economic zones,” and sliced into concession blocks.
Here, legality becomes a tool of dispossession. Land that was never up for negotiation is suddenly regulated, licensed, and cleared—often with a signature stamped far from the forest floor. Even the court’s affirmation in 2012 that “Customary Forest is no longer State Forest” has done little to protect Dayak land from bulldozers and armed security forces. Between the law and the bulldozer, there exists a legal void—a gap in enforcement where many communities fall, unheard and unrecognized.
This is not just displacement. It’s a slow erasure.
To be Dayak today is to walk a razor’s edge—balancing between asserting your rights and not becoming criminalized for harvesting from your own land. It is to hold on to ancestral memory while the world around you redraws the meaning of ownership. The Dayak are not relics of a pre-modern world. They are its rightful stewards, navigating a present that seems hell-bent on forgetting them.
Read Dayak’s fight: Survival, Identity, Sovereignty, and Future
In this struggle, the stakes are not just cultural. They are existential.
Because once the forest is gone, it’s not just the trees that fall.
A whole civilization begins to vanish —one tree, one river, one forgotten name at a time.
A Future in the Balance
As the legal landscape continues to evolve, the real struggle is one of survival. The fight for indigenous rights is not simply a battle for land, but for identity, culture, and the future of the planet. It remains to be seen whether Indonesia can reconcile its need for economic growth with the protection of its indigenous peoples and their sacred forests.
In the meantime, the forests stand as silent witnesses, caught in the crossfire of progress and tradition. The price of survival is not just measured in money, but in the very fabric of a way of life that has existed for centuries.
-- Masri Sareb Putra